Thursday, May 30, 2019

In Trumpland, impeachment is a dirty, filthy disgusting word



AROUND THE BLOCK

I learned…




I learned today, courtesy of Donald Trump, the definition of impeachment: "a dirty word; a dirty, filthy disgusting word." No, really. I looked it up.
im·peach·ment
/imˈpēCHmənt/
noun
1.       the action of calling into question the integrity or validity of something.
"the prosecutor's detailed impeachment of the character witness"
British
a charge of treason or another crime against the state.
"the king cynically abandoned him, encouraging his impeachment"
 US  
a charge of misconduct made against the holder of a public office.
"the president is facing impeachment over the scandal"
Trump
a dirty word; a dirty, filthy disgusting word.
“Impeachment? I can’t see how they can impeach me – I did nothing wrong, no crimes, no misdemeanors; the courts would stop it.”

“The courts would stop it?” OK, if there was any doubt before, let’s be clear: Trump ain’t no Constitutional scholar.

If there’s anything Trump said today that I agree with, it’s this: Robert Mueller is “conflicted.” But not how Trump defines it – as someone who “doesn’t like him”; someone who is a “Never Trumper;” someone who “surrounded himself with Hillary lovers.”

No, Mueller is conflicted because he believes in process and the rule of law. His conflict, despite the evidence, is that in his role as a special counsel, he could not go against DOJ guidelines and indict a sitting president, despite his admonition, “if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.” 

As Republicans remain mute and Democrats argue whether impeachment will help or hurt them in 2020 (recognizing that a Senate conviction is virtually impossible), it’s time for Bob Mueller to get real. Give up the Marine, Boy Scout stuff. Say what you really think – clearly, without nuance, in words that the majority of Americans will understand.

This is not business as usual and can’t go on. We’re beyond the political calculations. Trump is a disgrace. His toadies are a disgrace. Republican legislators (with the one exception, Justin Amash) are a disgrace. Bill Clinton was impeached because he lied about an illicit affair. Trump lies about everything. He is a danger to the country, no, the world. Something must be done. Take the ball, Mr. Mueller, and run with it.



Sunday, May 26, 2019

Harriet Tubman, "What Me Worry" Mnuchin, and Bloody, Bloody Andrew Jackson



AROUND THE BLOCK

I learned…



I learned this week that the redesign of the $20 bill featuring abolitionist Harriet Tubman, who escaped slavery and led hundreds of other people to freedom, will not be unveiled in 2020. 

Tubman was slated to replace slave owner Andrew Jackson — President Donald Trump’s favorite commander in chief — as part of the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, which gave women the right to vote. 

The announcement was made by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin who said the design process has been delayed until 2028. 

The decision to put Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill was first announced in 2016 by Obama Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, who, in making the announcement, knew it would be up to the next administration to implement the change. But, as the Washington Post wrote at the time, “it seemed highly unlikely that anyone would upend a plan to honor this great American hero with a currency redesign that would also include depictions of historic events such as the suffragist march on Washington.”

As Lew said, “I don’t think somebody’s going to probably want to do that — to take the image of Harriet Tubman off of our money? To take the image of the suffragists off?”

Lew obviously didn’t anticipate Donald Trump and his band of sycophantic toadies who will do whatever they can to not only reverse Obama-era initiatives but to extract revenge at groups who did not support our Foolish Leader in the 2016 election (see the Homeland Security Agency’s threat to send 1,000 illegal aliens a week to Broward and Palm Beach, Florida counties which voted overwhelming for Hillary Clinton).

But even more incredulous was the reasoning behind the delay.

“The primary reason we have looked at redesigning the currency is for counterfeiting issues,” Mnuchin said during a hearing before the House Financial Services Committee. “Based upon this, the $20 bill will now not come out until 2028. The $10 bill and the $50 bill will come out with new features beforehand.” 

Plausible? Not really. 

In the United States, the $20 bill is the most widely circulated and most frequently counterfeited note. (While the $100 note is the most frequently counterfeited denomination of U.S. currency outside the United States due to its broad circulation overseas, the “Benjamin” was redesigned with anti-counterfeit security measures in 2013). 

As the Washington Post editorialized this week, “it is more likely that Mr. Mnuchin feared President Trump would cause an uproar with an outright cancellation of a bill bearing Tubman’s image. As a candidate, Mr. Trump criticized the decision as 'political correctness,' and he has made no secret of his admiration for President Andrew Jackson, whose image Tubman would have dislodged from the front of the $20 bill."

So, the money man in Trump’s Gang Who Can’t Shoot Straight, Steve “What Me Worry?” Mnuchin, is not only a terrible Treasury Secretary, he's an obsequious flunky who doesn't have the imagination or resourcefulness to come up with a plausible excuse for the delay.

Steve "What Me Worry?" Mnuchin
Talking about plausibility — it is incredulous that any person of color or any woman (or anyone, actually) can possibly continue to support this vindictive, spiteful excuse for a president and his minions.

And, by the way, regarding Andrew Jackson – he signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830 which called for the relocation of Southeastern Native American tribes to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for white settlement of their ancestral lands. Hmm? Indian Removal Act? No wonder Trump admires Jackson; can you say Latino Removal Act?






Saturday, May 18, 2019

Surveys of Americans Show: Arab Numerals/Latin Letters –– Bad



AROUND THE BLOCK

I learned…


I learned recently that a poll taken by CivicScience, Inc. which asked 3,200 Americans, “Should schools in America teach Arabic numerals as part of their curriculum,” 56% of those surveyed answered “No,” 29% answered “Yes,” and 19% had “No Opinion.”


Subsequent to the initial publication of the survey, and aware that the majority of Americans are against Arabic numerals, CivicScience republished their findings in a way that most Americans would approve of:

“CivicScience, Inc recently asked MMMCC Americans, 'Should schools in America teach Arabic numerals as part of their curriculum.'” The results of the poll:

                        LVI%: “No”
                        XXIX%: “Yes”
                        XIX%: “No Opinion”

CivicScience, curious about the results, went back to some of the respondents who answered no to get a better insight into the reason for their answer. Here are some respondent replies: 
  • “Do you want your kids to use the same numerals that Arabs use? I don’t.”
  • “Letting some of them into our country is bad enough…now our kids have to use their numerals as well?”
  • “What are numerals, anyway?”
While the genesis of CivicScience’s survey was to get more general information from parents about how they feel about math instruction, given the surprising findings, the company decided that perhaps they should do a second survey about English instruction. In this second poll, they put the following question to respondents, “Should schools in America teach the Latin alphabet as part of their curriculum.” The results, 61%: “No,” 23%:  “Yes,” 16%:  “No Opinion”

Again, curious about the results, CivicScience followed up with a few of the participants. 
  • “I want my kids to learn the good, old American alphabet. None of that foreign stuff for me or my kids.”
  • “The Latin alphabet? I thought Trump’s wall was supposed to keep out those Latins. 
  • “I don’t think Americans should use Latin anything. If those Frisco people want to use Latin, let them…they’re not real Americans anyway.
America #1. Oops, I mean Америки #I.



Saturday, May 11, 2019

After 4th of July Stunt, Trump Deserves a True Leader's Name



AROUND THE BLOCK

I learned today...Croatian Special Edition



I learned today, courtesy of the Washington Post, that President Trump has taken charge of the nation’s premier Fourth of July celebration in Washington, Fireworks on the Mall, intending to take a “starring role” in the event by addressing the nation from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

According to the Post, Trump’s role has the potential to turn what has long been a nonpartisan celebration of the nation’s founding into another version of a Trump campaign rally. 

The Post goes on to say “the revised Independence Day celebration is the culmination of two years of attempts by Trump to create a major patriotic event centered on him and his supporters, including failed efforts to mount a military parade modeled on the Bastille Day celebration in France.”

I’m writing today’s Around the Block while on a trip to Croatia; I haven’t heard a lot of “Trump love” from the folks I’ve been meeting here. This latest stunt will most probably harden the local opinions of our “leader.” (On a side note, I did take a one-day trip across the border to Slovenia, the native home of Melania Trump. I asked our tour guide if the Slovenian people would like to take Melania back. “Maybe, but only if he doesn’t come with her.”

I had a wonderful lunch in Zadar, a beautiful Dalmatian Coast city once run by Mussolini and his Italian fascists. Because of its strategic importance, Zadar was so heavily bombed by the allies, it’s known as the “Dresden of the Adriatic..” 

The restaurant had a charming “Art Deco” vibe and a TV over the bar screening Charles Chaplin movies. During lunch the Great Dictator was playing – Chaplin’s bitingly satirical condemnation of Hitler, Mussolini, fascism, antisemitism, and the Nazis.

History, satire and current events converged for me at this lovely restaurant. Watching Chaplin skewering Hitler in what once was Mussolini’s Croatia, reading about our self-described “favorite president’s” latest self-aggrandizing excess, I couldn’t help but think, what was missing? 

An appropriate dictator’s “honorific.” 

If Hitler was “der Führer” and Mussolini was Il Duce, what is Trump? What would be the best, most telegraphic description of our own not-so-great leader?

Given the lip pursing, the arm folding body language, the over-the-top gesticulations, the ridiculous self-importance, there really is only one choice:

IL DOUCHEBAG




Let's hope a latter-day Chaplin will be bringing Il Douchebag the Movie to a theater near you this fall. 






Sunday, April 28, 2019

Still Hearing it Through the Grapevine -- The California Raisins



AROUND THE BLOCK

I learned today



I learned today, courtesy of the New York Times Magazine, that the California Dancing Raisins are still in the news. Sort of.

In an article entitled The Raisin Situation (online) and Raisin Noir (in print), the Times describes the animosity and rancor that is the raisin industry, based in and around Fresno, California.      https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/27/style/sun-maid-raisin-industry.html

As the article suggests, that enmity existed even back in the day when there was “a reluctance to work together on raisin advertising, which is especially strange given that the raisin industry commissioned and paid for one of the world’s most recognizable advertising campaigns,” the California Dancing Raisins.

As the individual responsible for supervising the California Raisin Advisory Board (CALRAB) account at the advertising agency Foote, Cone & Belding (FCB) that created the Dancing Raisins, I thought it might make sense to provide a little back story on that legendary campaign.

FCB was responsible for the CALRAB account for many years. Over those years the agency produced numerous TV advertising campaigns for the client…campaigns that were written against different marketing strategies all designed to stimulate raisin consumption.

There was the “Nature’s Candy” campaign which suggested to consumers that 100% natural raisins were indeed “candy from nature,” a wholesome, healthful snack to give to your children. The most notable spot in this campaign was called “Baby Sitter” which featured a very young, pre-Breakfast Club, Molly Ringwald playing a baby sitter extolling the virtues of giving raisins to her charges.

There was the “How They Make Them” campaign which, in one spot, showed kids loving their raisins but wondering how they were made…with the payoff – they weren’t made, they were 100% natural snacks, “made” by simply being dried in the California sun.  

Another wonderful spot in this campaign was the animated (not Claymation) “Factory” spot which whimsically demonstrated the raisin “factory assembly line”…raisins being picked, dried naturally in the sun and then packed.

But, despite these great ads, raisin sales remained flat.

So, a new strategy was developed, leaving snacking behind and emphasizing raisins’ versatility as an ingredient in a wide variety of recipes and dishes. The spot we ran, “Rondo” was simply beautiful, showing raisins falling in extreme slow-motion, into a variety of dishes with Mozart’s "Turkish Rondo" as the background music. This spot was so successful creatively, it won a Clio, at the time the advertising industry’s Oscar equivalent.

But raisin sales didn’t budge.

So back to the drawing board. And, what do advertising agencies do when they go back to the drawing board? Do research. Find out what the issues are. Determine what might trigger consumers into consuming more. And that we did.

The results of this research: consumers knew, after all those previous campaigns, all they needed to know about raisins – natural, wholesome, great for kids, great for snacking, great as an ingredient. But they didn’t think of them and when/if they did, they were kind of boring and old-fashioned.

Eureka! Let’s make raisins fun and hip and exciting. Let’s bring raisins, a product everyone knows, from the back of the mind to the front.

Armed with this insight we went back and developed a spot – young hip folks, enjoying raisins against a high-tempo, energetic sound track (I think we even had some fireworks for good measure). The client bought it, we developed a test “animatic” (a rough animation) which tested well. Production was scheduled a few months later.

My client at the time was Bob Phinney, CALRAB’s marketing director. Bob and I were on a European business trip promoting California raisin sales against our arch enemy, Turkish sultanas. 

Walking back to our Copenhagen hotel after a distributor’s dinner on a cold, snowy December night I confessed to Bob that I thought the spot we presented to CALRAB was OK, but not great. And since we had several months before we had to produce, would he let us try one more time to get to “great.” Bob, who was the best client I ever had, said, not surprisingly, “I’m with you…I’m not in love that spot either. Just tell me what it will cost.” I told Bob, “$20,000, the cost of another animatic.” His response, “Go for it. I’ll take care of the internal politics.”

The rest, as they say, is history. Back in San Francisco I got Seth Werner, a great creative, assigned to the account. Seth came up with the idea of dancing raisins, and importantly, the stroke of genius to use the heretofore little known Will Vinton and his Claymation technique, to produce it.

The animatic was produced. It tested through the roof and my team and I, with Bob’s support, recommended full production to the CALRAB marketing committee. There was only one roadblock. Sun Maid’s representative on the committee raised his hand and asked, “We already have a spot that tested well. I like that one. Why are we doing this?” To which I responded, “Because it’s better!”

As the Times article says, raisin sales spiked…but truth be told…Dancing Raisin merchandise and tchotchkes sales soared! 

At the time, Advertising Age, the industry trade bible, published a monthly survey listing the most remembered advertising during the previous month. The top 5 always included advertisers like Coke, Pepsi, McDonalds, each of whom spent upwards of $200 million on their TV campaigns. And California Raisins? Either number one, two or three in the survey. At a spend level of around $8 million.

Ah, the power of a great idea!


Saturday, April 27, 2019

We shall overcome Trump. We have survived worse.



AROUND THE BLOCK

I learned today


I learned today from a heartfelt column by the Washington Post's Dana Milbank and quotes from Civil Rights icon, Representative John Lewis, that despite Trump's excesses, lies and overall bad governance and despite how appalling we believe things are in Trump’s America, “As bad as things are now, we’ve gone through much worse.”


Dana Milbank: "We hear in Trump a refined version of (Birmingham Sheriff Bull) Connor and (Selma Sheriff Jim) Clark and (Alabama Governor) George Wallace as he exploits racial fears that have always been with us." 

John Lewis: “Whatever he tries to do, he cannot take us back. During the next few weeks and months and next year, there will be some setbacks. But the American people are not going back.”

Reason for hope? Let’s hope!


Thursday, April 25, 2019

Putin/Kim Summit -- What happened to the translators' note...and the translators?



AROUND THE BLOCK

I learned today


I learned today that Russian president Vladimir Putin and North Korean “dear leader” Kim Jung Un held a summit meeting today in the Russian Pacific port city of Vladivostok.

According to reporting from the Associated Press, the two dictators had high hopes for their first one-on-one meeting, which came amid deadlocked global diplomacy over the North Korean leader’s nuclear program.

It was Kim’s first visit to Russia as North Korean leader; his late father, Kim Jong Il, visited Russia in 2011. The North Korean leader evoked his father’s “great love for Russia” and said that he intends to strengthen ties between the two countries.

The summit follows two meetings between Kim and U.S. president Donald Trump. Those meetings resulted in the North Koreans being increasingly frustrated at the deadlocked negotiations. Last week, North Korea tested a new weapon and demanded that U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo be removed from the nuclear talks.

CNN reported that Putin said he was “pleased” with the outcome of the meeting saying, “We are all pleased with the outcome of the talks -- both I and my colleagues,” the Russian leader said. 

“Chairman Kim Jong Un is a fairly open person, leading a free discussion on all issues that were on the agenda.”

But, what was on the agenda?

Since neither Putin nor Kim speaks the other's language, translators were employed. 

Inside sources, speaking on the condition of anonymity since they were not authorized to talk, said that following the precedent set by Trump, translators’ notes were destroyed immediately following the meeting.

To ensure complete confidentiality however, Kim proposed, and Putin enthusiastically agreed, that not only should the notes be destroyed but that the translators be “eliminated.” It is not clear whether the dictators called on Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud (aka MBS-BAAS) to carry out the elimination.

Upon hearing on how Putin and Kim took care of the messy translator notes problem, Trump tweeted, “Heard my dear frends (sic) Vladimir and Kim have great way to eliminate leaks to the fake media. Why didn’t I think of that?!?!”


In a rare instance of Trump’s advisors exercising some restraint on their boss, staffers immediately pulled the post down.

When questioned about the incident, White House press secretary and senior flak, Sarah Huckabee “Colonel” Sanders told the press, “What tweet? Once again disreputable news outlets like Around the Block are promoting fake news.”